Legal Opinion

Rumph v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 29, 1939No. 27796PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

L. E. Eumph was indicted on the charge of “felony,.falsely personating another.” He was found guilty. He filed a motion in arrest of verdict and judgment. The motion was overruled, sentence was pronounced, and he excepted to the overruling of his motion. Omitting the formal parts, the indictment charged that “the said Eumph did falsely represent himself to be E. E. Bartlett an employee of the Southern Waxed Paper Company, and did falsely personate said E. E. Bartlett, in the passing and uttering of a certain check and writing, which was in form and substance as follows: ‘Southern Waxed Paper…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lanier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Prior v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1870
  3. Howell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  4. Mathews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Hubbard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Lockhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Floyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Hall v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API