State v. Henkel
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones
We granted the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ opinion that found the trial court should have dismissed respondent’s DUI charge because the videotape did not comply with the statutory requirements for videotaping respondent’s conduct at the scene of his DUI arrest. State v. Henkel, 404 S.C. 626, 746 S.E.2d 347 (Ct.App.2013); S.C.Code Ann. § 56-5-2953 (2006). We reverse.
FACTS
A witness observed a vehicle being driven erratically on I-385 and ultimately wrecking. Sergeant Hiott responded to the wreck and organized a search after learning from a witness…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Town of Mt. Pleasant v. RobertsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fullbright v. Spinnaker Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- State v. PradubsriCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- Teamer v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- State v. KinardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
- Lawrence ex rel. Situated v. Gen. Panel Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.