Nest26 Groups, Inc. v. Rader, Fishman & Grauer Pllc
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Nest26 Groups, Inc. (Nest) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellees Rader, Fishman & Grauer PLLC (Rader) and Mary Margaret O’Donnell (O’Donnell). Nest asserts that Rader and O’Donnell served as Nest’s legal representatives for the registration and assignment of its PRATTS trademark. Nest contends that the district court erred when it entered summary judgment based on Nest’s failure to establish the requisite attorney-client relationship for its breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and gross negligence claims.
Nest failed to present any evidence in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Russell Johnson, Iii v. Lucent Technologies Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Erikson v. NunninkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Zenith Insurance v. O'ConnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Stephenson v. Argonaut InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004