Legal Opinion

Wesley v. Don Stein Buick, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 30, 1998No. 97-2271-JWLPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

Plaintiff, an attorney, appears pro se in this civil rights action. The particular allegations in this case, which are not pertinent to the resolution of the pending motion, are set forth in Wesley v. Don Stein Buick, Inc., 985 F.Supp. 1288 (D.Kan.), order vacated in part, 996 F.Supp. 1299 (D.Kan.1998). On its own initiative on September 25, 1998, the court issued an order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c)(1)(B) requiring the plaintiff to show cause why she should not be sanctioned for advancing a patently frivolous argument (Doc.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Adamson v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Lloyd Michael ReidCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. McCampbell v. KPMG Peat MarwickDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1997
  5. Wesley v. Don Stein Buick, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marrie v. NickelsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  2. McCormick v. City of LawrenceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  3. Ferluga v. EickhoffDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  4. Drevaleva v. U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
  5. Lawrence v. Cherry Creek School District No. 5District Court, D. Colorado · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API