Legal Opinion

Holloman v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2005No. 03-160PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Chief Justice.

[T1] Appellant, Brian K. Holloman (Hol-loman), was convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to life in prison. He claims that the trial court committed reversible error by excluding from the evidence the criminal records of both the victim of his crime, as well as that of a third person present at the seene of the crime. Holloman also contends that the trial court committed reversible error in allowing prejudicial character evidence to be called to the attention of the jury. We will affirm.

ISSUES

[12] Holloman advances these issues:

1. Did the trial court commit…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gleason v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. Dean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Howard v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farmer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Barker v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Bloomfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Gabbert v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Garza v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API