Legal Opinion
United States v. Brooks
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 2001No. 23724PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHRUM, Judge.
Appellant sought to collect a judgment debt via a writ of garnishment against all accounts of James and Sandra Brooks (“Brooks”) at Ozark Mountain Bank (“Bank”). After the writ was purportedly served on Bank, Sandra Brooks closed her two accounts at the Bank. Appellant then moved for an order directing the Bank to pay into the circuit clerk’s office an amount equivalent to what Sandra Brooks had withdrawn from her accounts. Following an evidentiary hearing, the court entered judgment for the Bank. This appeal followed. We affirm.
In a court-tried garnishment action, our review is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- In Re Estate of LooneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Eagle Bank & Trust Co. Ex Rel. Roderman v. CorcoranSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Cox v. SteckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hardin v. HardinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baisch & Skinner, Inc. v. Jeffrey G. Bair d/b/a Grimm & Gorley, d/b/a J. Sent, Inc., and First BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Stevens Family Trust v. HuthsingMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Grissum v. SoldiMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re ParsonsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010
- Arrow Financial Services, L.L.C. v. BichselMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.