Legal Opinion

Arrow Financial Services, L.L.C. v. Bichsel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 2006No. WD 66090PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

The Jewelry Doctor, Inc. (“Jewelry Doctor”), as a garnishee, appeals a judgment entered in favor of Arrow Financial Services, L.L.C. (“Arrow”), as a garnishor, in a garnishment proceeding. Jewelry Doctor argues that the trial court erred in entering judgment against it without having first ruled on its objections to the garnishment interrogatories. Those objections raised the issue whether the garnishment interrogatories were filed and served as required by law. We find that fifing and proper service of those interrogatories is jurisdictional and, therefore, reverse…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Parmer v. BeanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Hood v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. McCullough v. NewtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Sexton v. Jenkins & Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lunde v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API