Legal Opinion

Hangman v. Bruening

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1995No. S-93-697PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

Keith D. Hangman’s 1992 petition to quiet the title to land over which Richard J. Bruening and Rita J. Bruening have an easement must be dismissed under the doctrine of res judicata, an issue which we raise sua sponte.

We vacate the March 8, 1993, judgment of the district court for Dixon County in favor of the Bruenings and remand the cause to that court with direction to dismiss Hangman’s June 2, 1992, petition filed against the Bruenings and against any interest the Bruenings have in the easement over Hangman’s land.

FACTS

On April 16, 1991, Hangman brought an action against the Bruenings to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schieffer v. Catholic Archdiocese of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. DeVaux v. DeVauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re Estate of WagnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Smith v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Dakota Title & Escrow Co. v. World-Wide Steel Systems, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stalnaker v. DLC, Ltd. (In Re DLC, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  2. Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of ElkhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ollison v. Village of Climax SpringsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Moulton v. BOARD OF ZONING APP., LINCOLNNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lincoln Lumber Co. v. FowlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API