Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Stanley Seidel McCarty D/B/A White Auto Store, Bankrupt v. The Small Business Administration, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 12, 1970No. 28457PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
We have concluded on the merits that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. Accordingly, we have directed the Clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties of this fact in writing. See 5th Cir. R. 18; Huth v. Southern Pacific Co., 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526; Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804.
The district judge below approved and adopted the order of the Referee in Bankruptcy denying Stanley McCarty’s discharge in bankruptcy. In an earlier successful loan application to the Small Business Administration, McCarty had failed to list among his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- In re SellersDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
- In the Matter of D. R. Sellers, Bankrupt v. Small Business AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hunt v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- In re FlemingDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1972
- Speed Equipment Worlds of America, Inc. v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974