Legal Opinion

Bess v. Bracken County Fiscal Court

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 1, 2006No. 2005-CA-000541-MRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VANMETER, Judge.

By statute, local governing bodies may pass ordinances regulating dogs so long as the provisions are not inconsistent with KRS Chapter 258. The primary issue we must resolve is whether a Bracken County ordinance which bans the possession of pit bull terriers is inconsistent with that chapter. We hold that it is not and therefore affirm the judgment of the Bracken Circuit Court.

In 2004, the Bracken County Fiscal Court passed an ordinance which dealt generally with animal control and included provisions banning pit bull terriers. Bracken County, Ky. Ordinance §§…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Califano v. TorresSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Nicchia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Garcia v. Village of TijerasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Wynn v. Ibold, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weigel v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  2. Tracey v. SoleskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Benningfield ex rel. Benningfield v. ZinsmeisterKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Sen v. TsiongasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  5. State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API