Engel v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
This is an action to recover income loss benefits under a no-fault insurance policy. In granting summary judgment for the insurer the trial court concluded: (1) that the six-year statute of limitations does not bar the action; (2) that the notice provision is unambiguous and does not implicate the reasonable expectations doctrine and (3) although the policy misstated the insured’s coverage and may have caused the insured to mistakenly believe that his injuries were not covered, the notice provision still applies,
The statute of limitations issue was not appealed. Although…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Bowler v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Streich v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nathe Bros., Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999