Legal Opinion

State v. Pittman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1971No. 7118SC543PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

The State, in a diligently prepared case, presented evidence which was more than sufficient to withstand defendant’s motions for nonsuit. Defendant’s assignments of error based on the denial of these motions are overruled.

Defendant’s assignments of error directed to the charge of the court are meritorious. In a very brief charge the court’s explanation of the law consisted largely of a reading of the statute under which defendant was charged.

“When a person is on trial, charged with having committed a statutory crime, it is not sufficient for the court merely to read the statute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Brannon v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Bulluck v. LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. EASTERN CAROLINA FEED & SEED COMPANY v. MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. WingoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API