Legal Opinion
County of Los Angeles v. Soto
California Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1984No. L.A. 31678PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, J.
The County of Los Angeles (County) appeals from an order of the superior court granting defendant’s motion to set aside a judgment entered pursuant to an “Agreement for Entry of Judgment” that had been executed in conformity with Welfare and Institutions Code section 11476.1.1
In County of Ventura v. Castro (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 462 [156 Cal.Rptr. 66], the court held that section 11476.1, authorizing entry of judgment to *486determine paternity and child support pursuant to stipulation, was constitutionally infirm because it failed to provide for the notice and hearing required by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rochin v. Pat Johnson Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Ferraro v. CamarlinghiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Carr v. KaminsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Lugo v. LugoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- John Siebel Associates v. KeeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.