Legal Opinion

Matter of Silverman (Hoe & Co.)

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1953PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDye, J.

Being dissatisfied with the terms and conditions of a plan of merger with a subsidiary and recapitalization offered by the respondent, R Hoe & Co., Inc., hereinafter called the Corporation, the petitioners and other stockholders owning 66,547 shares of the authorized 160,000 shares of the corporation and representing approximately 42% of the total common shares outstanding, dissented therefrom, When the corporate *16stockholders authorized to vote thereon approved the proposed plan, the petitioners and others then instituted this appraisal proceeding pursuant to section 21 of the Stock…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alexander v. . AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Matter of City of New York (Court House)New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Matter of Petition of N.Y. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Matter of Water Comrs. of White PlainsNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Amella v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Dubin v. Mobile Land Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. State v. KRASZYK ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Alexsey v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Cohen v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API