Legal Opinion
Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Eastern Fine Paper, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 28, 1981No. Civ. 79-51-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE COURT
TIMBERS, Circuit Judge: *
This is a patent action. The patent at issue is one involving the binder used in the manufacture of dry gummed paper. The claims of the parties are those which have come to be recognized as standard in a patent action.
After a five day bench trial on the merits at Portland in December 1980 before the undersigned, and the case having been fully briefed and argued by counsel, the Court renders the following opinion which constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).
I
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
In these…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Altvater v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- North Dakota Fair Housing Council, Inc. v. AllenDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2004
- SEA SALT LLC v. BELLEROSEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019