Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

J-A-F-S

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided August 28, 2025No. ID 4119PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

29 I&N Dec. 195

(BIA 2025) Interim Decision #4119 Matter of J-A-F-S-, Respondent Decided August 28, 2025 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals An Immigration Judge generally should not continue an individual hearing based on a respondent’s speculative assertion that he or she may be eligible for a new form of relief from removal not previously raised. FOR THE RESPONDENT: Monica N. Ganjoo, Esquire, San Jose, California FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Jessica E. Long, Assistant Chief Counsel BEFORE: Board Panel: MALPHRUS,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PhinpathyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Rios-PinedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. HASHMIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
  5. SIBRUNBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pinzon RozoBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API