Legal Opinion

People v. McClain

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1970No. Docket 8,643PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

On the day of his trial for prison escape, * defendant requested a continuance, contending that the defense was not ready for trial, petitioned for another appointed attorney, and stated he was not ready to conduct his own defense. He gave no reason for this sudden change and would not elaborate.

The court made the following statement:

“Well, you will not tell me why. I cannot grant any motion on that basis without any basis for your motion. You just say you are not ready for trial, and don’t know how long this has been around— since April. No indication of any reason as to why you are not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. Arither ThomasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. People v. StinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. People v. BynumMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. People v. FordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. People v. EdwardsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HenleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. People v. HardnettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API