People v. Henley
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.
This case is here by order of the Supreme Court remanding the record “for ascertainment therefrom of facts which will fairly frame the alleged issue of double jeopardy and for a judicial determination thereof”. People v. Henley (1969), 382 Mich 143, 150, reversing (1965), 2 Mich App 54. The question presented is whether the defense of double jeopardy was available as a bar to the retrial of defendant Henley, after his previous trial had ended abortively when the trial court, sua sponte, declared a mistrial.
We state the facts solely as they relate to the issue of double jeopardy.
I
On June 20,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. GardnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. PribbleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. BlassingameMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. BradleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.