Legal Opinion
Raslavsky v. Moore
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 3, 1974PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacDonald, J.
The plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment rendered by a state referee denying their request for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendants, the mayor and the director of finance of the city of Milford, to furnish the plaintiffs certain financial data which they claimed to be necessary to enable them to discharge their duties as members of the board of finance of the city of Milford.
The finding, which is not subject to correction, 2 relates the following facts: The city of Milford is a specially chartered municipal corporation. The charter establishes the board of finance, and requires…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lahiff v. Saint Joseph's Total Abstinence & Benevolent SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Hannifan v. SachsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Boyko v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Scala v. Airport CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- George S. Chatfield Co. v. ReevesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Light v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Raslavsky v. BonvouloirSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Clark v. GibbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Cislo v. SheltonConnecticut Superior Court · 1978
- Cislo v. City of SheltonConnecticut Superior Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.