Legal Opinion
Kashelkar v. Ruben & Rothman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 2, 2001No. 00-7751PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.
Ashok Kashelkar, pro se, appeals a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (McMahon, J.) dismissing his complaint.
I
In September 1999, Kashelkar filed a complaint against Household International, Inc., a Chicago-based holding company; two of its subsidiaries, Household Bank F.S.B. and Household Recovery Services; and Household’s lawyers, the law firm of Rubin & Rothman LLC, as well as four of its…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frank D. Jones v. New York State Division of Military and Naval Affairs and New York State Army National GuardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Stuto v. FleishmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Kashelkar v. MacCartneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
3Cited by2 opinions
- Koulkina v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Burke v. Verizon Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020