Legal Opinion
Sanchez v. Crandon Wholesale Drug Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 31, 1967No. 66-138PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWANN, Judge.
This case is not new to us. In Sanchez I,1 we held that a party terminating a nonexclusive agency contract, terminable at will, was under no obligation to reimburse the other party for reasonably incurred preliminary expenses, even though the other party had had no chance to recoup these expenses. The Supreme Court reversed in Sanchez II,2 choosing not to draw a distinction between non-exclusive and exclusive contracts. The position taken by the First District,3 allowing recovery for damages suffered during the period in which a contract is performed, was upheld. In Sanchez III,4…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- FLORIDA-GEORGIA CHEM. CO v. National Laboratories, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Gibbs v. Bardahl Oil CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Philadelphia Storage Battery Co. v. Mutual Tire StoresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Meyer v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Sanchez v. Crandon Wholesale Drug Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Prince v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Ventanas Del Caribe, S.A. v. Stanley WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Boston v. Jewish Community Centers of South Florida, Inc., Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County1974