Legal Opinion
Hartford Insurance Group v. Rubinshteyn
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 22, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, reinstated.
In this declaratory judgment action, Hartford Insurance Group seeks a declaration that it is not obligated to defend 18th Avenue Garage, Inc. (Garage), its named insured under a Garage Hazard No. 1 policy, in negligence and wrongful death actions in which Garage is a named defendant, arising from the alleged negligent operation of a vehicle sold by Garage to defendant Dennis Schwartz. The Appellate Division held that Hartford had no…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. RossalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Phoenix Insurance v. GuthielNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Abrams v. Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Switzer v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Toker v. HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burr v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- National Grange Mutual Insurance v. SantanielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Cotton v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. A.L.J.A., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Constable v. MatieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.