Legal Opinion
Toker v. Hartford
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Silverman, J.
Defendant, The Hartford, appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court granting plaintiff summary judgment declaring that defendant Hartford is obligated to defend on behalf of plaintiff, Sharon M. Toker, and to pay any judgments that may be granted against Toker up to the limits of the Hartford policy with Empire Volkswagen, Inc. ("Empire”), a named insured.
Plaintiff Sharon M. Toker purchased an automobile from Empire Volkswagen, an automobile dealer, and took at least physical possession thereof on December 16, 1975. She alleged that as she did not have her…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sturges Manufacturing Co. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Phoenix Insurance v. GuthielNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Rudes v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Switzer v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Grange Mutual Insurance v. SantanielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc. v. ARP Films, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Hartford Insurance Group v. RubinshteynNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hartford Insurance Group v. RubinshteynNew York Court of Appeals · 1985