Legal Opinion

Scarbrough v. Meeks

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 26, 1991No. 90-3712PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, John Scarbrough, seeks review of an order entering a permanent injunction against him. He alleges two errors on the part of the trial court: first, that the injunction was entered in violation of his due process rights, and second, that the trial court improperly denied his motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action for injunctive relief. Contrary to appellant’s contentions, we find that the complaint does state a cause of action. See Drake v. Henson, 448 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). We agree, however, that the permanent injunction was entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Continental Chemicals, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. State Road Dept. v. Newhall Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951
  3. Smith v. Housing Auth. of the City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  4. Drake v. HensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eastern Federal v. State Office SupplyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Trans Health Management Inc. v. NunziataDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Skyway Trap & Skeet Club, Inc. v. SOUTHWEST FLA. WATER MANAGEMENT DIST.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Rieder v. RiederDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API