Scarbrough v. Meeks
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant, John Scarbrough, seeks review of an order entering a permanent injunction against him. He alleges two errors on the part of the trial court: first, that the injunction was entered in violation of his due process rights, and second, that the trial court improperly denied his motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action for injunctive relief. Contrary to appellant’s contentions, we find that the complaint does state a cause of action. See Drake v. Henson, 448 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). We agree, however, that the permanent injunction was entered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bennett v. Continental Chemicals, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- State Road Dept. v. Newhall Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Smith v. Housing Auth. of the City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Drake v. HensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eastern Federal v. State Office SupplyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Trans Health Management Inc. v. NunziataDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Skyway Trap & Skeet Club, Inc. v. SOUTHWEST FLA. WATER MANAGEMENT DIST.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Rieder v. RiederDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016