Legal Opinion

Mudlin v. Hills Materials Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Vanessa Mudlin (Mudlin) was employed by Hills Materials Company (Hills) of Rapid City, South Dakota. She was assigned to a crew that was working on a road construction project near Faith, South Dakota. While traveling to the job site, Mudlin was injured as a result of a one-vehicle accident. She filed a claim for workers’ compensation against Hills and its insurer. The South Dakota Department of Labor ruled in favor of Mudlin. The circuit court affirmed and Hills appeals to this Court. We affirm.

Facts

[¶ 2.] In the spring of 1999, Mudlin lived in Rapid City, South…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. VerBouwens v. Hamm Wood ProductsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Helmbolt v. LeMars Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Wagaman v. Sioux Falls ConstructionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Grauel v. South Dakota School of Mines & TechnologySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Orth v. Stoebner & Permann Construction, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Holscher v. Valley Queen Cheese FactorySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Fair v. Nash Finch Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Peterson v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Wise v. Brooks Construction ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API