Legal Opinion

Rotert v. Faulkner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1983No. 12985PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Judge.

Charles E. Faulkner and Alice M. Faulkner, makers of a promissory note, appeal from a judgment against them for the full amount of the note. They argue that, as a matter of law, they owe only half the balance due. The facts are undisputed.

The Faulkners signed the note September 29, 1977. It was payable to the order of Elmer E. Miller and Ronald R. Rotert “as joint tenants and not as tenants in common.” The principal amount was $25,000, “with interest thereon from the date of death of Elmer E. Miller” at the rate of eight percent per annum. Principal and interest were payable in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Longacre v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. Sauter v. LeveridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Kaw Valley State Bank & Trust v. Commercial Bank of Liberty, N.A.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Blue Valley Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BurrusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Gershon v. AshkanazieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Knickerbocker v. CannonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Centerre Bank of Branson v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. MFA INC. v. DettlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Gibson v. HarlMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Home Trust Mercantile Bank v. StaggsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API