Harris v. Crist

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment for defendants in this action to set aside a transfer of real property as a fraudulent conveyance. After the case was tried but before the court entered judgment, plaintiffs moved for reconsideration or, in the alternative, for a new trial. As part of that motion, they moved “to amend the complaint to conform to the proof.” The court denied the motions and entered judgment for defendants. We affirm.

Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that, on April 30, 1985, they obtained a judgment in Canada against defendants; that the debt upon which the judgment was based was…