Legal Opinion

Call v. McKenzie

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1975No. 13646PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Neely, Justice:

This writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum was issued to review the question of whether an indigent criminal defendant convicted upon a plea of guilty is entitled on appeal or in a habeas corpus proceeding to a free transcript of all relevant material of record in his case. The case of State ex rel. Wright v. Boles, 149 W. Va. 371, 141 S.E.2d 76 (1965) is overruled and we hold today that henceforth an indigent criminal defendant shall always be entitled, upon request, to a free transcript of the entire record of his case. Our holding today is prospective only, except with…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. Losh v. McKenzieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. White v. HainesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State Ex Rel. Simpkins v. HarveyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. NeumanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API