Legal Opinion

Laul v. L. Alamos Nat'l Labs.

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided September 27, 2016No. 15 CV 749 JAP/KBMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES A. PARKER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In DEFENDANT LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC'S MOTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 67) (Motion), Los Alamos National Laboratories (LANS)1 seeks dismissal of all of Plaintiff's claims brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ( 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. ) (ADEA), Title VII ( 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) ), and the New Mexico Human Rights Act ( NMSA 1978 § 28-1-1 et seq. ) (NMHRA). Plaintiff Dr. Jagdish C. Laul (Plaintiff) opposes the Motion. See PLAINTIFFS [sic] RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kuhler v. PHI Health, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024
  2. Laul v. Los Alamos National LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
  3. Reinkemeyer v. Ironhorse Dental Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API