Legal Opinion

United States of America, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant/appellant v. $25,000 U.S. Currency, and Tomasino Gino Cirimele, Claimant/appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 8, 1988No. 85-5854PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

The United States filed a civil forfeiture action pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) against money seized from Tomasino Ciri-mele (“Cirimele”) following his arrest at Los Angeles International Airport. Ciri-mele moved to suppress the evidence obtained from him at the airport. The district court granted Cirimele’s motion, stating that the agents did not have a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity so as to justify Cirimele’s detention. Cirimele .thereafter moved for summary judgment against the government in the forfeiture action. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. $191,910.00 in U.S. Currency, Bruce R. Morgan, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Chong in KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Jacob Ikperha Orhorhaghe v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. MarolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Bennie Demetrius WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API