Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Bahsen v. Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 30, 2015No. Civil Action No. 11-1210PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Hon. Madeline Cox Arleo, United States District Judge
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation’s (“Boston Scientific”) appeal of Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mann-ion’s decision denying Boston Scientific’s Motion to Disqualify Blank Rome, Plaintiffs counsel, for an imputed former client conflict under New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct 1.10 and 1.9. The central dispute concerns whether an attorney who is held by a law firm out as having a general and continuing relationship with it is “associated with” that firm for conflicts…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- United States v. Miller, William G.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- In Re Corn Derivatives Antitrust Litigation (Mdl 414). Appeal of John E. Koerner & Co., Inc., Imperial Products Corporation, and Pan-O-Gold, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Asurion, LLC v. Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLPDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
- HINKER v. COUNTY OF CAPE MAYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Prentice v. OfficeMax North America, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2021