Legal Opinion

Danielson v. Pratt Industries, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 2006No. 93A02-0510-EX-1005PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Plaintiff, John R. Danielson, M.D. (Dr. Danielson), appeals the dismissal of his Application for Adjustment of Claim for Provider Fee by the Worker's Compensation Board in favor of Appellee, Defendant, Pratt Industries, Inc. (Pratt).

We affirm.

ISSUE

Dr. Danielson raises three issues on appeal, which we consolidate into one issue and restate as: Whether the Workers' Compensation Board erred in determining that it did not have jurisdiction over Dr. Danielson's Application for Adjustment of Claim for Provider Fee.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On May…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Saler v. IrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Bowles v. General ElectricIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Inland Steel Co. v. PavlinacIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Obetkovski v. Inland Steel IndustriesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Krause v. Indiana University—Purdue University at IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Indiana Spine Group v. Pilot TravelIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Indiana Spine Group, P.C. v. International Entertainment ConsultantsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API