Banales v. Smith

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding J.

¶ 1 Appellant, Daniel Banales, appeals from the trial court’s decree granting appel-lee, Keri Robinson, custody of their daughter and visitation rights to Daniel. Daniel argues the trial court erred by failing to consider a necessary child custody factor and make an express finding on it as required by A.R.S. § 25-403. 1 Because Daniel failed to object in the trial court, we affirm.

¶2 After a series of disagreements over custody and visitation of their daughter, G., which culminated in a confrontation between the parties on September 28, 1997, Daniel filed a…