Legal Opinion
Royal Insurance v. Mazzei
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 18, 1942No. Civ. 2666PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered in favor of respondent Harry E. Abraham, after his demurrer to the third amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend, appellant having declined to further amend. The defendants,' other than Abraham, did not demur and the judgment does not mention them.
The material allegations of the third amended complaint are that on October 27, 1939, defendant Harry E. Abraham owned and operated a cotton gin and yard; that at that time he had in his possession, in storage, 30 bales of cotton owned by R. G. Hamilton & Company and insured…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shanley v. American Olive Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Mautino v. Sutter Hospital Assn.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Dingman v. AF Mattock CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Blodgett v. B. H. Dyas Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- McIntyre v. HauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Miller v. Pacific Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Metzenbaum v. MetzenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Frace v. Long Beach City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- McClure v. CeratiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.