Adamczyk v. Shapiro
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtPruyn, J.
The plaintiffs are children of Mary Adamczyk and as aggrieved persons have appealed under § 17-2b of the General Statutes from the action of the defendant in denying to Mary Adamczyk medical assistance for the aged as provided for in § 17-135a. A fair hearing as required by § 17-2a was held, and the transcript of the hearing together with the hearing decision constitutes the record in the trial court. § 17-2b. On such an appeal there is no trial de novo; the court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the commissioner; its basic function is to determine whether the commissioner acted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blackard v. Monarch's Manufacturers & Distributors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1960
- Rhodes v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- Ouellet v. ShapiroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965
- Wolosoff v. Gadsden Land & Building Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rebman v. Welfare CommissionerConnecticut Superior Court · 1973
- Rebman v. Welfare CommissionerPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1973