Legal Opinion

Adamczyk v. Shapiro

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 30, 1966No. File No. CV 17-6510-3644PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPruyn, J.

The plaintiffs are children of Mary Adamczyk and as aggrieved persons have appealed under § 17-2b of the General Statutes from the action of the defendant in denying to Mary Adamczyk medical assistance for the aged as provided for in § 17-135a. A fair hearing as required by § 17-2a was held, and the transcript of the hearing together with the hearing decision constitutes the record in the trial court. § 17-2b. On such an appeal there is no trial de novo; the court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the commissioner; its basic function is to determine whether the commissioner acted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blackard v. Monarch's Manufacturers & Distributors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Rhodes v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  3. Ouellet v. ShapiroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965
  4. Wolosoff v. Gadsden Land & Building Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rebman v. Welfare CommissionerConnecticut Superior Court · 1973
  2. Rebman v. Welfare CommissionerPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API