Legal Opinion

Wolosoff v. Gadsden Land & Building Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 1944No. 7 Div. 795PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The question on this appeal is whether the employees of Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (hereafter referred to as Goodyear) have such an interest in a contract between Goodyear and Gadsden Land and Building Corporation (hereafter referred to as the Housing Company) as to prevent Goodyear and the Housing Company from agreeing to rescind the contract, and permit the Housing Company to sell the land to complainants freed from said contract.

The Housing Company was stipulated by the contract to own or that it will acquire five hundred and seventy-six acres of land, and shall…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Baltimore, Md. v. RainerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Ross v. ParksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Bethea v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Barlowe v. Employers Ins. Co. of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Anderson v. Howard Hall CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Christopher W. Ross, Individually and D/B/A 4r Ornamental Iron Company v. Imperial Construction Company, Inc. And Imperial Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Willingham v. LankfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API