Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Parker

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1953No. 5428Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing

LUJAN, Justice.

Defendants (appellees) have moved for a rehearing and therein complain that we did not discuss certain points argued in their briefs and orally in our opinion. It must not be thought that because we do not reply to all arguments of counsel that such arguments have not been duly considered. In the present instance we thought the matter so well settled that no comment was necessary. However, the zeal and insistence of counsel for defendants have caused us to go over the matter again, and we conclude that it may be of service to the bar if we discuss the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reusens v. LawsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Armstrong v. MorrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Dye v. CraryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Shackelford v. McGlashanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Lawless v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API