Legal Opinion

Shackelford v. McGlashan

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1921No. 2561PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Bernalillo County; Hickey, Judge. Action by W. H. Shackleford against A. E. Mc-Glashan and another to cancel a tax deed and subsequent conveyance based on it. Demurrer to complaint sustained, and the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT.

DAVIS, J.

This is a proceeding to cancel a tax deed and subsequent conveyances based upon it. It was decided by the trial court upon a demurrer alleging that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, this demurrer being sustained. The facts are therefore admitted, and we state them from the complaint. On January 1, 1908, John Schroeder was the owner of 160 acres of land described as the S. W. 1/4, S. 17, Tp. 9 N., R. 3 E., N. M. P. M., the land being located in Ber-nalillo county. This was the only 160-acre tract which he owned at that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. McFatterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Lewis v. MonsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Chisholm v. BujacNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Knight v. FairlessNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Meller v. HodsdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pratt v. ParkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. State Tax Commission v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. King v. DohertyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Lawson v. SernaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Mutual Investment & Agency Co. v. Albuquerque Farm & Ranch Land Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API