Legal Opinion
Jolly v. Superior Court of Pinal County
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 1975No. 12061PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Justice.
The petitioner, Earl Jolly, seeks relief by a special action against the respondent court alleging an abuse of discretion in denying petitioner’s motion for a protective order under Rule 26(c) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S. The denial of the motion for protective order was made in an action in which two employees of Salt River Project seek to recover damages from respondent railroad for injuries sustained in a truck-freight train collision; the truck was owned by Salt River Project and occupied by the two employees at the time of the collision. Mr. Earl…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bredice v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1970
- Pioche Mines Consolidated, Inc., Ely Valley Mines, Inc., and John Janney v. Helen Dolman, John Janney v. Helen DolmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Jack S. MacHin v. Eugene M. Zuckert, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Tucson Medical Center, Incorporated v. MisevchArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Nataros v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Farrell v. Hursh Agency, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Green v. NygaardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.