Legal Opinion
Farrell v. Hursh Agency, Inc.
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1986No. 85-43PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Justice.
This appeal asks whether error was committed when the trial court entered a default judgment pursuant to Rule 37(b)(2)(C), W.R.C.P., for the reason that the appellants failed to comply with the court’s discovery orders. Appellants contend the default was improperly granted and that the hearing on damages after the default judgment was not correctly conducted.
We will affirm.
Appellee Hursh Agency, Inc. (Hursh) brought suit against appellants Norman Farrell and Helen Farrell and against Safeway Stores, Inc. and the Mall Centers In-termountain, Inc. By stipulation of counsel,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dundee Cement Company v. Howard Pipe & Concrete Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- LP v. Natrona County Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Hicklin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- John R. Henry, Jr. v. Amalie Sneiders, and Amalie Sneiders, as Personal Representative of the Estateof Maksis Sneiders, Deceased, Defedant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Hursh Agency, Inc. v. Wigwam Homes, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Albany County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Nowotny v. L & B Contract Industries, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Spitzer v. SpitzerWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.