Flagel v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Jackson district court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Benson, J.:
A road was laid out by order of the board of county commissioners, upon petition, notice and view in the usual manner provided by statute. The appellant owned land upon the route of the road, and was given notice as required by section 4 of the road law. (Laws 1874, ch. 108, § 4, Gen. Stat. 1909, § 7277.) He presented a written claim for damages, which was considered by the viewers, and damages were allowed thereon, but not for the amount claimed. The viewers made their report to the board in favor of the establishment of the road, with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fulkerson v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Comm'rs of Wabaunsee Co. v. MuhlenbackerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Reisner v. StrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Kent v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Briggs v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Wichita v. MeyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- Evans v. EdelbrockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Coffman v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Wilson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912