Anderson v. Kellog

In their first and second propositions of law, appellants contend that when a court requests an appropriation of funds for its operating expenses, it must submit to a hearing, and bears the burden of proving that the amount requested is reasonably necessary for its continued operation. They contend further that, in this instance, the court’s appropriation request was unreasonable, and should be overturned in this appeal. Appellants’ contentions are without merit.

R. C. 2151.10, as it read at the commencement of this cause,1 provided, in part, that:

“The board of county commissioners shall…