State v. Gabler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Defendant was convicted of burglary with a tool following a trial by jury. Minn. St. 609.58, subd. 2(1) (a). He presents three issues on appeal to this court.
First, did the trial court err in admitting evidence alleged to have been seized from defendant. The error is based on defendant’s claim that the state did not comply with the requirements of State ex rel. Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539, 141 N. W. 2d 3 (1965). At the time defendant pleaded not guilty, the state announced in open court that it intended to use evidence obtained as a result of search and seizure and admissions in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. WajdaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. FriendCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.