Legal Opinion

Sinick v. County of Summit

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 22, 2002No. 5:01-cv-02101Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GWIN, District Judge.

On February 19, 2002, Defendants Summit County, Tami Cook, Stephen Sample, Keith Gowan, and James R. Dodds 1 (collectively “Defendants”) filed a motion for summary judgment (Doc. 69) as to the claims that Plaintiff Gary Sinick makes in his first amended complaint (Doc. 47). Plaintiff Sinick’s complaint makes three claims for relief. The first claim, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2002) (“section 1983”), alleges an illegitimate search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The second claim alleges a violation of the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API