Legal Opinion

Kipp v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1994No. 244-91PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MALONEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in a trial by jury of the offense of indecency with a child. The jury assessed punishment at five years confinement, probated. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Kipp v. State, 802 S.W.2d 804 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1990). 1 We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that (1) the trial court properly refused to permit appellant to perfect an offer of proof, (2) the State’s expert witness did not improperly testify about the truth or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Kemp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Rabbani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Nobles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Rojas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Bunton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  5. Turro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API