Legal Opinion

Cascade Shopping Center v. United Grocers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 3, 1991No. 89-2695-L-3; CA A65319PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Plaintiff lessor brought this action to recover $252,243.96, plus interest, costs and attorney fees from defendant, alleging that defendant is liable for the obligations under plaintiff’s lease, as modified, with R.V.L.P. Foods, Inc. (RVLP). The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and plaintiff appeals from the resulting judgment. We review the record in the light most favorable to plaintiff, Seeborg v. General Motors, 284 Or 695, 588 P2d 1100 (1978), and affirm.

On February 3, 1987, plaintiff, owner of Cascade Shopping Center, and Drive and Save, Inc. (Lessee)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Abbott v. BOB'S U-DRIVEOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Huff v. DuncanOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Daniels v. PARKEROregon Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New Technology Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Milestone Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Value Linx Services v. Linx Card Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API