Legal Opinion
United States v. Belknap
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California
Decided March 23, 1896No. 579PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELLBORN, District Judge.
This is an action at law, against Gorington G. Belknap and others, to recover $731.21 for a breach of the official bond of said Belknap as an Indian agent.. The complaint. after setting forth the appointment of said Belknap as Indian agent, alleges, among other things, that the bond was made and delivered July 26, 1884, by said Belknap as principal, and the other defendants as sureties; that said Belknap held and exercised the agency to which said bond relates from July 26, 1884, until August 30, 1887, inclusive. The breach alleged in the bond is the failure of said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Seaman Field v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Fames v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1887
- United States v. ShawU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Pond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Shooters Island Shipyard Co. v. Standard Shipbuilding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- United States v. Fidelity Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- New Departure Mfg. Co. v. Sargent & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.