Legal Opinion

M. Brotchiner & Sons, Inc. v. M. Ullman, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.

On May 9, 1929, an impostor, whose identity seems never to have been ascertained, appeared at the sales rooms in New York city where the plaintiff was engaged in the sale of furs. He introduced himself as Herman Goodman, a brother of Victor Goodman, a reputable dealer of Toronto, Canada, for whom he said he was authorized to make purchases of furs. From the plaintiff’s stock he selected various skins at an aggregate price of $2,029.75. For these he paid by two checks drawn on the Royal Bank of Canada, which he carried with him and which purported to be signed by “ V. Goodman.” The skins, he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phelps v. . McQuadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Edmunds v. Merchants' Despatch Transportation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Hentz v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Island Trading Co. v. Berg BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ellison v. HunsingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Russell Willis, Inc. v. PageSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  3. Handley Motor Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Handley Motor Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API