Legal Opinion

Handley Motor Co. v. Wood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtErviN, J.

The defendants tendered this issue: “Was it the intent of Handley Motor Company and James P. Junghans, Jr., that legal title to the Ford automobile should pass to Junghans at the time Junghans’ check was given in payment?” They asked the trial judge to submit such issue to the jury instead of the first and second issues or in addition to them, and saved an exception to his refusal to pursue either of these courses.

The defendants stressfully contend that the submission of this issue to the jury was essential to the determination cf the crucial factual question whether or not the legal title of…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Leitch v. Sanford Motor Truck Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Ellison v. HunsingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Handley Motor Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API