Legal Opinion
State v. Stevens
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided October 15, 1986No. 85-1130PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
We granted the State’s application for discretionary review, see Iowa Code § 814.-5(2)(6); Iowa R.Crim.P. 11(2), of the district court’s order partially sustaining a motion to suppress, see Iowa R.Crim.P. 11(1). The district court concluded certain evidence obtained by a police officer in a warrantless patdown search of defendant Orman Daniel Stevens could not be admitted at trial. It reasoned the search could not be upheld as one incident to arrest. Our review is de novo. See State v. Lamp, 322 N.W.2d 48, 50 (Iowa 1982). We reverse the judgment of the district court, and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hulse v. State, Department of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ThomteNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Westendorf v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.